Louie Sison
Proposed Bill Seeks to Ban TikTok and Other Foreign Adversary-Controlled Apps in the Philippines
A new bill has been filed in the Philippine House of Representatives that could potentially ban the popular social media app TikTok and other applications controlled by “foreign adversaries.”
House Bill 10489, authored by Manila Representative Bienvenido Abante Jr., aims to prohibit the distribution, maintenance, and update of these apps within the country.
The proposed legislation has sparked discussions about national security, data privacy, and the influence of foreign entities on the Philippine digital landscape.
Details of House Bill 10489
Under the proposed “Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Regulation Act,” the President would be authorized to determine any foreign country as an adversary or a threat to the Philippines’ national security and territorial integrity.
The bill specifically targets applications controlled by these foreign adversaries, with TikTok being a primary concern due to its ownership by China-based ByteDance.
Rep. Abante expressed his apprehensions about TikTok’s data collection practices, stating that the app’s access to sensitive user information could enable the Chinese government to influence and shape public opinion in the Philippines.
He cited the United States’ passage of a law banning TikTok and India’s decision to ban the app along with other Chinese-created applications as precedents for his proposed legislation.
Implications for App Developers and Users
If House Bill 10489 is passed into law, it would effectively restrict new downloads of foreign adversary-controlled applications and limit interaction with their content.
The bill also prohibits Internet hosting services in the country from supporting these apps, further curtailing their reach and functionality.
App developers and companies based in countries deemed as foreign adversaries may face significant challenges in distributing and maintaining their products in the Philippine market.
This could potentially impact the competitiveness and diversity of the app ecosystem in the country, as well as limit users’ access to certain applications.
Concerns over Chinese Influence in Philippine Infrastructure
Rep. Abante highlighted the growing Chinese presence in critical infrastructures in the Philippines, particularly the 40-percent stake held by Chinese companies in both the National Grid Corp. of the Philippines (NGCP) and Dito Telecommunity.
He expressed concern over these arrangements, as the Chinese companies are ultimately owned by the People’s Republic of China and, by extension, the Chinese Communist Party.
The proposed bill aims to empower the Philippine government to prevent foreign adversarial countries from using modern technology or public utilities to threaten national security and territorial integrity.
It underscores the need for vigilance and proactive measures to safeguard the country’s interests in an increasingly interconnected digital world.
Penalties for Violators
House Bill 10489 outlines strict penalties for those found in violation of its provisions. Individuals or entities that distribute, maintain, or update foreign adversary-controlled apps could face imprisonment of 6 to 12 years and fines ranging from PHP5 million to PHP10 million.
Meanwhile, those providing Internet hosting services to support these apps would be subject to imprisonment of 3 to 6 years and fines of PHP500,000 to PHP4 million. These substantial penalties aim to deter potential violators and underscore the seriousness of the proposed legislation.
Conclusion
The introduction of House Bill 10489 in the Philippine Congress has ignited a crucial conversation about the role of foreign-controlled applications in the country’s digital space.
As lawmakers deliberate on the merits and potential consequences of the proposed legislation, it is essential for stakeholders—including app developers, users, and policymakers—to engage in informed discussions and consider the implications for privacy, security, and digital rights.
While the bill’s proponents argue that it is necessary to protect national security and prevent foreign interference, critics may raise concerns about its impact on free speech, innovation, and the open nature of the Internet.
As the debate unfolds, it will be crucial to strike a balance between safeguarding the country’s interests and preserving the benefits of a diverse and interconnected digital ecosystem.
The fate of House Bill 10489 and its potential impact on popular apps like TikTok now lie in the hands of Philippine legislators.
As the nation navigates the complexities of the digital age, the decisions made regarding this proposed legislation will shape the future of the country’s online landscape and its relationship with foreign-controlled technologies.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings